Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest
Loss Integrity Science / Unethical Research Protocols
Policy Formulation for Unethical Research Protocols

If industry prevails in its bid to get the EPA to consider results of human trials on the effects of pesticide ingestion, their studies will require the assistance of licensed physicians to monitor test subjects.

http://armchairactivist.us/2003/08/06/policy-formulation-for-unethical-r...

Multiple Chemical Sensitivities Under Siege

In 1990, the Chemical Manufacturers Association (now the American Chemistry Council) vowed to work to prevent the recognition of MCS out of concern for potential lost profits and increased liability if MCS were to become widely acknowledged (2).

It specifically committed to work through physicians and medical associations to accomplish this, stating that it was critical to keep physicians from legitimizing MCS. Unfortunately, this plan has been relatively successful.

The industry has enlisted the aid of vocal anti-MCS physicians who promote the myths that people with MCS are “hypochondriacs,” “hysterical,” “neurotic,” suffer from some other psychiatric disorder, belong to a “cult,” or just complain too much. Most of these physicians work for industry as high-paid expert witnesses although their financial ties are usually not disclosed in their journal articles, interviews, or speaking engagements. Therefore, many people, including those in the health care profession, are often led to believe that these physicians’ opinions reflect an honest appraisal of MCS rather than the chemical industry’s agenda.

At least one industry expert witness has authored two anti-MCS position papers for prominent medical associations. It is easy to see why these papers are biased against MCS and how by helping to combat MCS in the courts, these position statements are quite lucrative for industry and expert witnesses.

http://www.mindfully.org/Health/MCS-Under-Siege.htm

 

sunWISE design

Contact the Webmaster with any questions, suggestions or submissions.

DISCLAIMER: This is an Information Only Website and is NOT in any way, intended to replace the advice or consultation with a licensed health care provider/professional. This website owner does not have any medical qualifications whatsoever. If you have any health problems you are strongly advised to consult with a fully qualified health-care professional. The information herein is from many sources and represent the opinions of both medical and non medical persons. Any copyrighted materials if used, must comply with the Fair Use Act. If you are the copyright owner of any material presented on this website and you do not want it appearing on this website, please contact Website Owner and such material will be removed immediately upon such request.
FAIR USE NOTICE: Extensive links and other data on this website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the Copyright Owner. Such material is made available for information and educational purposes only, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, et al.. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.
The inclusion of a link on this site does not constitute an endorsement by the Global Recognition Campaign of any organization's policies or activities, or of any item for sale. Global Recognition Campaign makes no guarantees regarding information, data or links contained on non-Campaign web sites.
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.
These pages and any and all sub-pages are the property of mcs-global.org who claim World Wide Copyright as the authors.
Any unauthorised copying would be considered a breach of their intellectual rights and would be proceeded against accordingly.